01 / 04 · The Problem
Atlanta · 2026
Fractional COO
Theory Reality Gap™
Fractional COO · $25M+ Growth-Stage

Built for the company you became.

Cassidine Consulting redesigns the operating model so the technology you already bought finally delivers what it promised. We stay until the change holds.

Find Out Where It's Breaking Take the Scorecard
No cost. No pitch. If the Diagnostic doesn't surface a fixable gap, the engagement stops.
Revenue Floor
$25M+
Structure
Diagnostic + Retainer
Timeline
As long as needed
Built on McKinsey 2025 State of AI MIT NANDA Deloitte AI Enterprise 2026 IBM CEO Study 15+ Years Inside Operations Theory Reality Gap™ Framework
Searcie Cassidine
Fractional COO · Cassidine Consulting
MBA · Operations Mgmt LSSBB 15+ Years Inside Ops Theory Reality Gap™ Atlanta · Nationwide
Book No-Cost Call →
01
The Problem
04 chapters · 02 min read

Everything you've tried was built for a different company.

You grew. Things started breaking. Customers started complaining.

You were sold AI as the solution. It didn't work. You brought in the vendor. Then the consultant. Then the trainer. Everyone had a framework — and every solution was built for a company that doesn't operate the way yours does. So nothing stuck.

You were told it was a people problem. So you laid people off. Replaced them. Restructured. And the problem came back.

The Pattern

In four moments, you'll recognize your own company.

Every $25M+ growth-stage company we work with arrives by the same path. The names are different. The pattern isn't.

01
Year 01–02
Growth.
You scaled. Things started breaking. Customers noticed first.
Cost so farMargin compression begins
02
Year 02–03
The cycle of help.
Vendor. Consultant. Trainer. Each with a framework. None stuck.
Spent$1M – $5M on outside help
03
Year 03
The people verdict.
You laid off. Replaced. Restructured. Then waited.
LostTop performers + institutional knowledge
04
Year 03 – present
The recurrence.
The same problem returned. At scale. With the bill on top.
Now bleeding$4M – $8M per year
The Diagnosis

It isn't a technology problem. It's an operating model problem.

What goes wrong

The technology is fine. The operation is the problem.

AI accelerates whatever the organization is already designed to produce. If the design is broken, AI makes it broken faster.

  • Decision rights stay the same — but the new technology routes everything differently
  • Managers absorb new overhead with no authority and no relief
  • KPIs measure the old work, not the work that's actually being done
  • Process flows still match the org chart from before the implementation
What works instead

Redesign the operation. Then the technology lands.

McKinsey 2025: the single strongest correlation with AI EBIT impact is fundamental workflow redesign.

  • 55% of high-performing AI companies fundamentally redesigned workflows during deployment
  • Only ~20% of everyone else did
  • That difference correlates more strongly with EBIT impact than any other variable
  • The redesign is the work. I stay until the change holds.
The Theory Reality Gap™
Strategy intent Operation reality The Gap YEAR 0 YEAR N
What Failure Actually Costs

The number nobody computes until it's too late.

When AI or enterprise software doesn't land, the line item on your P&L is just the software cost. The real number is six to twelve times larger — and it shows up across three phases. Below is the modeled annual bleed for a $75M company.

Phase 01
Selection

Before you even bought

$200K – $500K
  • Advisory and consulting fees to research the vendor
  • Leadership time across 3-6 months of selection
  • RFP, demos, POCs, vendor management
  • Legal review, procurement, security assessments
Phase 02
Deployment

To put it in place

$2M – $5M
  • AI/software licenses and annual integration
  • Implementation consultancy (Accenture-tier)
  • Internal IT and ops allocation
  • Change management, training programs
  • Custom development and data integration
Phase 03
Annual Bleed

Every year it doesn't deliver

$4M – $8M+
  • License fees running with no ROI
  • Margin compression (3-5% of OpEx)
  • Customer churn from service degradation
  • Talent loss (manager-level departures)
  • Leadership opportunity cost firefighting
$6M – $13M+
Year-one bleed for a $75M revenue company

At $150M+ revenue, the number runs $15M – $30M+ in Year One. These costs continue every year the operating model remains unchanged. The longer you wait, the more it compounds.

If you're bleeding $6M+ a year, every month you wait is a month you don't get back.

Start with a no-cost advisory call. 60 minutes. We figure out which gap is leaking the most.

Book No-Cost Advisory Call
The Cassidine Rebuild

One engagement. Two tracks. No fixed timeline.

Cassidine Consulting closes the gap between what your strategy intends and what the operation actually produces — internally (operations) and externally (customer value and service). Diagnostic up front. Retainer to deploy the roadmap. We're done when the gaps close.

Track 01 · Internal

Operations Rebuild

Find where strategy and structure separated inside the operation. Stop value leak in margin, speed, and execution. Redesign the operating model so the technology you bought actually delivers.

What it touches
Decision rights · Process · Accountability · KPIs · Operating rhythm · AI/software integration.
Track 02 · External

Customer Value & Service Rebuild

The same framework, customer-facing. Find where the brand promise and the customer experience separated. Stop value leak in retention. Rebuild how the operation delivers what customers were sold.

What it touches
Brand promise · Service consistency · Customer journey · Retention · Renewal systems.
How It Works

One shape. Repeats for both tracks.

Stage 01
01

The Diagnostic

One-time fee · Stand-alone or extends to Stage 02

Find where the gap is. Map the current state. Identify where value is leaking and where waste is hiding.

What you get
  • Theory Reality Gap™ report (track-specific)
  • Current-state operating model map
  • Top 5 prioritized gaps by margin / customer / talent impact
  • Executive debrief presentation
  • Signable roadmap for Stage 02
Stage 02
02

Roadmap Deployment

Monthly retainer · 3-month minimum, then open-ended

Run the roadmap. Redesign the operating model. Stay until the gaps close.

What happens monthly
  • Weekly operating rhythm with leadership
  • Process and decision-rights redesign (the actual work)
  • Monthly Theory Reality Gap™ re-scoring
  • Quarterly executive milestone review
  • Final transition memo and capability handoff
No fixed timeline ≠ endless retainer
04 exit conditions

The off-ramp criteria — written into the contract

01

Milestone completion. Priority gaps from the Diagnostic have closed.

02

Internal leader ready. A permanent operator has been hired to own the work.

03

Theory Reality Gap re-score. Quarterly re-score shows closure below a defined threshold.

04

Client readiness. You say "we're good." That's it. No friction.

The engagement flow · start to finish
Stage 01 Diagnostic If Gap Found Stage 1 → 2 Stage 02 Roadmap Deployment Off-Ramp Met Stage 2 → 3 Stage 03 Transition Out If No Fixable Gap · You Only Pay The Diagnostic Fee
Pricing

Transparent. Tiered by your size. Concurrent tracks save meaningfully.

Stage 01 · Diagnostic (one-time · 50% on signature, 50% on delivery)

Buyer sizeOperationsCustomer Value & ServiceCombined (concurrent)
$25M – $50M$45K – $75K$60K – $100K$95K – $155KSAVES 15-20%
$50M – $150M$75K – $120K$95K – $155K$150K – $240KSAVES 15-20%
$150M+$120K – $225K+$155K – $285K+$245K – $440K+SAVES 15-20%

Stage 02 · Roadmap Deployment Retainer (3-month min, then open-ended)

Buyer sizeOperationsCustomer Value & ServiceCombined (concurrent)
$25M – $50M$22K – $32K/mo$30K – $45K/mo$48K – $70K/moSAVES 10-15%
$50M – $150M$32K – $48K/mo$45K – $68K/mo$70K – $105K/moSAVES 10-15%
$150M+$48K – $75K/mo$65K – $100K/mo$105K – $160K/moSAVES 10-15%

Customer Value & Service is priced higher than Operations because it's structurally harder work — it requires redesigning the parts of the operation customers already see, which means redesigning under live load with no margin for error.

✓

The Diagnostic is the gate. For both of us.

If the Diagnostic doesn't surface a fixable gap, I tell you that — you pay only the Diagnostic fee and you do not sign the retainer. Maximum downside is the Diagnostic fee. I don't take on engagements I don't believe I can close.

For Your CFO

The math your CFO will ask about. Modeled, sourced, honest.

An illustrative model for a $75M revenue company with $1.2M in annual AI/software spend running a Full Rebuild for 12 months. Every number anchored to industry research.

Investment · 12-month engagement

What you'd invest

Combined Diagnostic (one-time)
$190K
Combined Retainer · 12 mo @ $85K/mo
$1.02M
Total 12-month investment
$1.2M
Annual recoverable value (model)

What you'd recover

Operating efficiency (4-7% EBIT)
$3.0M – $5.3M
AI ROI realization (20-40%)
$240K – $480K
Customer retention (1-2 pt churn)
$750K – $1.5M
Talent retention
$200K – $500K
Total annual recoverable
$4.2M – $7.8M
4-7×
Year-one ROI · payback in 2-4 months

Maximum downside is the Diagnostic fee. If the Diagnostic doesn't surface a fixable gap, the engagement stops there. The math holds because the cost of not doing this is 5-10× the engagement cost.

Engagement Pattern

What the work actually looks like. A representative example.

Representative model engagement. Company, names, and figures are illustrative — a composite drawn from typical patterns. Real client case studies available once written permissions are secured.

$85M ARR Series C SaaS · recovered NPS, reduced churn, got AI to land — in 10 months.

Everyone told them the answer was more AI. The answer was redesigning the service operating model around the AI they'd already bought.
Industry
Enterprise SaaS
Stage / ARR
Series C · $85M
Engagement
Full Rebuild · 10 months
Investment
$500K total

The buyer story

Grew $40M → $85M in 24 months. NPS dropped 52 → 23. Two advisors recommended AI service agents. They spent $1.8M on CRM + AI agents + an implementation consultancy. Six months later, complaints were unchanged. Churn ticking up 14% → 18%. Three CX managers resigned in the same quarter. Board started asking pointed questions.

The Diagnostic finding (8 weeks)

The AI agents were resolving 60% of inbound tickets. The remaining 40% — escalations — were routed to mid-level CX managers who had no authority to resolve them. Decision rights had never been redesigned. The managers were managing the AI's escalations on top of their existing work. The dashboard showed success while the customer experience collapsed underneath.

The redesign (8 months)

Redesigned the service operating model around the AI. New decision-rights matrix. Dedicated tier-2 pod from existing CX team. KPI realignment to resolution quality + cycle time. Customer journey rebuilt around the new flow. AI agent prompts retrained to fit the new escalation rules. Internal VP of Operations promoted in month 7 to own the operating model post-engagement.

MetricPre-engagement12 months postChange
Customer NPS2347+24 pts
Annual customer churn18%11%−7 pts
AI ticket-resolution rate60%78%+18 pts
CX manager turnover28%9%−19 pts
Annual margin impact recovered—$4.2M8.4× ROI
NPS Recovery · Pre-engagement vs. 12 months post
60 40 20 0 Pre Month 2 Month 5 Month 8 Month 12 Projected 23 47
NPS — Actual recovery
Projected without redesign
"The AI consultancy did their job — they deployed what we bought. Cassidine did the job the AI consultancy couldn't do: she rebuilt the operation around what we'd bought, so the technology investment finally paid off."
— Composite quote · representative pattern
The Research

Six numbers from the firms whose decks your board reads.

The technology works. The organizations running it don't.

0%
of enterprise GenAI pilots produce zero P&L return
MIT NANDA · 2025
0%
of AI-using companies see EBIT impact. 88% are deploying.
McKinsey · 2025
0%
of high-performing AI companies fundamentally redesigned workflows
McKinsey · 2025
Common Questions

The six questions every leader asks.

These are the objections that surface in every advisory call. I've answered them straight — no consultant hedging.

06 Questions · Answered Below

Something not here? Ask it on the advisory call. No question is too pointed.

Why not just hire an interim COO?

An interim COO costs $25-40K/month, takes 90-120 days to onboard, and doesn't bring a framework. I'm faster, I have the diagnostic IP, and I leave behind a documented operating model — not just a warm seat.

Most interim COOs come through executive search firms with 25-33% placement fees on top of comp. "Interim COO + recruiter cost" frequently exceeds the Cassidine Full Rebuild fee.

How is this different from McKinsey, BCG, or Deloitte?

They sell strategy and leave. I sell strategy and stay until the change holds. McKinsey's 2025 research found that workflow redesign is the single strongest correlation with AI EBIT impact. They don't do the redesign — that's the work I do.

Why not give the AI more time to work?

Time isn't the variable. MIT NANDA found 95% of GenAI pilots produced zero P&L return — not because the technology failed, but because the operating model never changed. Time doesn't close that gap. Redesign does.

What's the ROI?

For every $1 invested, the recoverable value lives in four buckets: operating efficiency, AI ROI realization, customer retention, and talent retention. Year 1 ROI runs 5–10× depending on size, with payback in 1–3 months.

What if it doesn't work?

Then we'd have caught it in the Diagnostic. If the Diagnostic doesn't surface a fixable gap, you pay only the Diagnostic fee and you don't sign the retainer. I don't take on engagements I don't believe I can close.

Can you do this faster?

I can do the Diagnostic faster. I can't make redesign faster than the organization can absorb. Pushing redesign faster than the team can hold creates the exact pattern we're trying to break — the change doesn't stick.

N
What I Won't Do

The honest filter — read it before you book.

Non-Negotiable

These four rules cost me clients. I keep them anyway. Because every engagement I've seen go sideways traced back to one of them being bent — and the work didn't hold.

If any of these four are dealbreakers for your team, we're not a fit. Better we find out here than three weeks in.

— Searcie
Founder · Cassidine Consulting
01
Rule

I won't hand you a deck and leave.

The engagement ends with a working operating model, not a recommendation. If you want a deck, hire Big-3 strategy.

InsteadI stay through the redesign and remain on retainer until the change holds.
02
Rule

I won't configure your software.

That's the implementation consultancy's job. They configured the platform. I redesign the operation around what they deployed so it actually delivers value.

InsteadI rebuild the workflows, roles, and decision rights the technology was supposed to support.
03
Rule

I won't say the answer is more training.

Training doesn't fix a structural design problem. It can't hold inside an operating model that wasn't rebuilt — which is why most "AI enablement" programs deliver nothing.

InsteadI fix the structure first, then build the capability around the new model.
04
Rule

I won't treat people and operations as separate.

Organizational design and talent development are one system — not two budgets, not two workstreams, not two consultants. I work the whole thing or I don't work it.

InsteadOne engagement. One redesign. People and process treated as the single operating system they actually are.
About

Searcie Cassidine. Operator, not advisor.

Photo · Searcie
Drop a photo of yourself here. Vertical orientation works best.
Searcie Cassidine · Atlanta · 2026
Searcie Cassidine
Fractional COO · Cassidine Consulting
  • MBA · Operations Management & Supervision
  • Lean Six Sigma Black Belt (LSSBB)
  • 15+ years inside operations — not adjacent to them
  • Built the Theory Reality Gap™ framework
  • Atlanta · available across the U.S.

I get inside your operation and fix how work actually flows. That means diagnosing where strategy and structure have separated, redesigning processes, aligning roles to outcomes, and staying in the work until the change holds.

I built the Theory Reality Gap framework after seeing the same pattern in companies across industries: organizations produce what they're built to produce, regardless of what leadership intends. Closing that gap is the work.

SMBs and corporate organizations · Organizational strategy & talent development as one system, not two budgets.

Start Here

Now you know where the gap is. Let's talk about how to close it.

60 minutes. No cost. No pitch. We figure out where the structural gap is, whether Cassidine Consulting is the right partner to close it, and what the next step looks like.

Book Your No-Cost Advisory Session Or Take the Scorecard First
No obligation · No cost · 60 minutes
60
Minutes
$0
Cost To Book
0
Slide Decks
1
Honest Answer
Ready to figure out where it's breaking? The advisory call is no-cost, no-pitch, 60 minutes.
Book No-Cost Call